Nigerian opposition’s petitions challenging the presidency of Bola Tinubu struck out presiding judge labels litigations unmeritorious and nebulous
Nigeria’s Presidential Elections Petitions Tribunal (PEPT) on Wednesday rejected an opposition challenge to Bola Tinubu’s win in February’s disputed vote, following a pattern seen in previous election years in Africa’s most populous country.
The PEPT judges
No legal challenge to the outcome of a presidential election has succeeded in Nigeria, which returned to democracy in 1999 after three decades of almost uninterrupted military rule and has a history of electoral fraud.
Tinubu’s supporters outside the court
Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP), who came second and third respectively, had asked the court to invalidate the election, alleging irregularities.
Judge Haruna Tsammani, reading out a lengthy ruling on behalf of the tribunal’s panel of five justices, rejected Obi’s petition point-by-point. He was reading Atiku’s petition, which was also dismissed.
Obi’s petition was “unmeritorious” and had “not led any credible evidence sufficient enough” to back his claims of irregularities, Tsammani said.
Atiku’s suit was called “nebulous”.
The country was tense before Wednesday’s ruling, with increased security in the capital, Abuja. The Presidential Guards Brigade and Army Headquarters garrison were mobilised including dozens of police and security service officers.
Despite warnings from authorities against demonstrations, various political groups gathered outside the courthouse, singing and dancing.
The ruling on the same day marked Tinubu’s 100 days in office and will be a huge relief to him
The president will now keep an eye on the Supreme Court where his opponents are likely to appeal against this judgement.
European observers had said in June that the elections were marred by problems including operational failures and a lack of transparency that reduced public trust in the process.
However, the elections stirred little sign of a groundswell of popular opposition, and Tinubu has been accepted by the international community as Nigeria’s legitimate leader. As the tribunal was giving its ruling, Tinubu was in India preparing to take part in the G20 summit there.
Atiku and Obi can appeal to the country’s Supreme Court to strike down the tribunal’s ruling. Any appeal must be concluded within 60 days of the date of the tribunal judgment.
While favourable to Tinubu, the tribunal’s ruling was unlikely to generate any particular euphoria or momentum for the president after an election marked by record low turnout of 29%.
In a nation of more than 200 million people of whom 87 million were registered to vote, Tinubu garnered just 8.79 million votes, the fewest of any president since the return to democracy, limiting the goodwill towards him.
Tinubu inherited anaemic economic growth, high unemployment, the highest inflation rate in two decades, record debt, massive oil theft that has hit government revenue and widespread insecurity from predecessor Muhammadu Buhari.
He has launched a string of reforms, including the removal of a popular but costly petrol subsidy and of currency controls, but has run into resistance from labour unions, who organised a two-day general strike this week and are planning another.
Akowe with reports from Abuja additional materials from Reuters/BBC/X/RT